NASIR ALI vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/7238/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 19th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011018822026

Filing Number

CRWP/48409/2026

Filing Date

15-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRWP/7238/2026

Registration Date

16-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

19-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 20-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NASIR ALI

    Adv. KARAN SINGH RANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 19-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRWP 7238/2026 - Nasir Ali v. State of Punjab Nasir Ali petitioned for protection of his life and liberty, alleging that a proclaimed offender (Respondent No.4) against whom he had filed a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 complaint was pressurizing him to withdraw the case. The petitioner had also made a representation to the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Malerkotla, but received no response. Justice Deepak Gupta directed the SSP, District Malerkotla, to investigate the petitioner's representation, assess any threat to his life and liberty, and provide necessary police protection if warranted. The petition was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 15-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/7238/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRWP 7238/2026 - Nasir Ali v. State of Punjab Nasir Ali petitioned for protection of his life and liberty, alleging that a proclaimed offender (Respondent No.4) against whom he had filed a Negotiable Instruments Act Section 138 complaint was pressurizing him to withdraw the case. The petitioner had also made a representation to the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Malerkotla, but received no response. Justice Deepak Gupta directed the SSP, District Malerkotla, to investigate the petitioner's representation, assess any threat to his life and liberty, and provide necessary police protection if warranted. The petition was disposed of. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case