JASPAL KAUR vs ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND OTHERS Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL PUNJAB — CWP/18355/2023
Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC011018502023
Filing Number
CWP/40943/2023
Filing Date
09-Aug-2023
Registration No
CWP/18355/2023
Registration Date
21-Aug-2023
Judge
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari
Coram
Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari
Bench Type
Single
Category
63.72 - MAINTENANCE AND WELFARE OF PARENTS/SENIOR CITIZENS ( 764 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.JASPAL KAUR
Adv. Ritesh Aggarwal
Respondent(s)
-
1.ADDITIONAL DISTRICT MAGISTRATE AND OTHERS Advocate - ADVOCATE GENERAL PUNJAB
-
2.NARENDER PAL SINGH
-
3.BALWINDER KAUR
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF
Summary of CWP-18355-2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside an order passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner on 11.04.2023, which had adjourned a senior citizen's application for eviction of her son and daughter-in-law under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The Court found the order vitiated by jurisdictional error because: (1) under the Act's statutory framework, eviction applications must be adjudicated exclusively by the Maintenance Tribunal in the first instance, not by Appellate Tribunals; and (2) the Additional Deputy Magistrate lacked statutory authority to pass quasi-judicial orders, as District Magistrates cannot sub-delegate their functions to subordinate officers. The matter was remitted to the proper Maintenance Tribunal for fresh adjudication within four months, with parties directed to appear on 12.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
22-Aug-2023
Other
-
09-Aug-2023
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/18355/2023
Summary of CWP-18355-2023 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana set aside an order passed by the Additional Deputy Commissioner on 11.04.2023, which had adjourned a senior citizen's application for eviction of her son and daughter-in-law under the Maintenance and Welfare of Parents and Senior Citizens Act, 2007. The Court found the order vitiated by jurisdictional error because: (1) under the Act's statutory framework, eviction applications must be adjudicated exclusively by the Maintenance Tribunal in the first instance, not by Appellate Tribunals; and (2) the Additional Deputy Magistrate lacked statutory authority to pass quasi-judicial orders, as District Magistrates cannot sub-delegate their functions to subordinate officers. The matter was remitted to the proper Maintenance Tribunal for fresh adjudication within four months, with parties directed to appear on 12.06.2026. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts