CHANAN SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/7148/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011009442026

Filing Number

CRWP/47779/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRWP/7148/2026

Registration Date

15-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Coram

Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh Brar

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.CHANAN SINGH

    Adv. DIVYA GULATI

  2. 2.CHANAN SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.CHANAN SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Harpreet Singh BrarView PDF

    Case Summary: CRWP/7148/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Chanan Singh's petition seeking protection from alleged threats of false criminal implication. Singh, a 20-year veteran Patwari with a clean record, argued police were threatening to falsely implicate him in FIR No. 0085 (registered against another person) at the behest of a complainant. The court found no evidence of illegality, mala fides, or abuse of process at the nascent investigation stage, dismissing the petition as premature while clarifying that the investigating agency must proceed strictly according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/7148/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRWP/7148/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Chanan Singh's petition seeking protection from alleged threats of false criminal implication. Singh, a 20-year veteran Patwari with a clean record, argued police were threatening to falsely implicate him in FIR No. 0085 (registered against another person) at the behest of a complainant. The court found no evidence of illegality, mala fides, or abuse of process at the nascent investigation stage, dismissing the petition as premature while clarifying that the investigating agency must proceed strictly according to law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case