UJJVAL BHASIN vs UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate - Satya Pal Jain (Sr. Adv.) — CWP/21680/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 20-Sep-2022

CNR: PHHC011009042022

Filing Number

CWP/40400/2022

Filing Date

07-Sep-2022

Registration No

CWP/21680/2022

Registration Date

19-Sep-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri , Mrs. Justice Amarjot Bhatti

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri , Mrs. Justice Amarjot Bhatti

Bench Type

Double

Category

76.1 - CASES RELATING TO STREET VENDORS/HAWKERS ( 806 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.UJJVAL BHASIN

    Adv. KAILASH CHANDER

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION OF INDIA AND ORS Advocate - Satya Pal Jain (Sr. Adv.)

  2. 2.THE COMMISSIONER

  3. 3.ASST COMMISSIONER

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasgurpreet Singh Puri,mrs. Justice Amarjot BhattiView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Ujjval Bhasin's civil writ petition for non-prosecution on May 11, 2026, as the petitioner failed to appear at the hearing. The petition concerned street vendor actions by Chandigarh Municipal Corporation, but lacked specificity and no vendors were impleaded as parties; the respondents confirmed Supreme Court directions were being complied with meticulously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 20-Sep-2022

    Other

  4. 07-Sep-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/21680/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Ujjval Bhasin's civil writ petition for non-prosecution on May 11, 2026, as the petitioner failed to appear at the hearing. The petition concerned street vendor actions by Chandigarh Municipal Corporation, but lacked specificity and no vendors were impleaded as parties; the respondents confirmed Supreme Court directions were being complied with meticulously. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case