MANJIT SINGH AND ANR vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/33695/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011008842026

Filing Number

CRM-M/47672/2026

Filing Date

10-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/33695/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANJIT SINGH AND ANR

    Adv. MANJOT SINGH RAI

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

  3. 3.HARVINDER SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a successive anticipatory bail petition filed by Manjit Singh and another in a fraud/criminal breach of trust case, holding that a second petition requires material change in circumstances. The court rejected the petitioners' claim that an alleged compromise constituted such change, noting their continued non-cooperation with investigation despite dismissal of an earlier identical petition, and found that permitting successive petitions without genuine circumstantial changes would be impermissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 10-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/33695/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed a successive anticipatory bail petition filed by Manjit Singh and another in a fraud/criminal breach of trust case, holding that a second petition requires material change in circumstances. The court rejected the petitioners' claim that an alleged compromise constituted such change, noting their continued non-cooperation with investigation despite dismissal of an earlier identical petition, and found that permitting successive petitions without genuine circumstantial changes would be impermissible. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case