ABHISHEK MARSKOLE vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR — CRM-M/33626/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 17th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011005742026

Filing Number

CRM-M/47534/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/33626/2026

Registration Date

10-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.11 - REGULAR BAIL OF CYBER CRIME PUNJAB ( 211 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

17-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 19-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHISHEK MARSKOLE

    Adv. INDERPREET SINGH KOONER

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ANR

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 17-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/33626/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Abhishek Marskole, accused of defrauding retired IGP Amar Singh Chahal of approximately Rs. 8 crores through a fake online investment scheme ("DBS Group") operating via WhatsApp and Telegram. The court granted bail considering Marskole's five months of custody, clean antecedents, completed investigation, magistrate-triable offences, and his severe osteoporosis requiring medical care, while imposing conditions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/33626/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CRM-M/33626/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Abhishek Marskole, accused of defrauding retired IGP Amar Singh Chahal of approximately Rs. 8 crores through a fake online investment scheme ("DBS Group") operating via WhatsApp and Telegram. The court granted bail considering Marskole's five months of custody, clean antecedents, completed investigation, magistrate-triable offences, and his severe osteoporosis requiring medical care, while imposing conditions against witness intimidation. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case