AKKO AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/6958/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011005602026

Filing Number

CRWP/47497/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRWP/6958/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.AKKO AND ANOTHER

    Adv. VAISHALI THAKUR

  2. 2.AKKO

  3. 3.AJAY KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.AKKO

  3. 3.AJAY KUMAR

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer)

  5. 5.AMRIK SINGH

  6. 6.JOGINDER KAUR

  7. 7.JASBIR SINGH

  8. 8.MANOHAR SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted protection of life and liberty to two major individuals living in a consensual live-in relationship against family members' threats, holding that constitutional protection of life applies equally to such couples as to those married against parental wishes. The court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, to consider the petitioners' security representation and ensure no harm befalls them, while clarifying this provides no legal endorsement of the relationship and does not shield them from criminal proceedings if involved in cognizable offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/6958/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted protection of life and liberty to two major individuals living in a consensual live-in relationship against family members' threats, holding that constitutional protection of life applies equally to such couples as to those married against parental wishes. The court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Kapurthala, to consider the petitioners' security representation and ensure no harm befalls them, while clarifying this provides no legal endorsement of the relationship and does not shield them from criminal proceedings if involved in cognizable offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case