JYOTI AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/6956/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011005472026

Filing Number

CRWP/47481/2026

Filing Date

09-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRWP/6956/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor

Coram

Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JYOTI AND ANOTHER

    Adv. GITESH SHARMA

  2. 2.JYOTI

  3. 3.RAJ KAMAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.JYOTI

  3. 3.RAJ KAMAL

  4. 4.SHO (Station House Officer)

  5. 5.SHYO PRAKASH

  6. 6.SHRAVAN KUMAR

  7. 7.PATRAM

  8. 8.SUBHASH

  9. 9.PAWAN

  10. 10.MANISH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Rohit KapoorView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of a petition by two majors (Jyoti and Raj Kamal) seeking protection of life and liberty after their marriage on 06.06.2026, which faced opposition from relatives. The court directed respondent No.3 to decide the petitioners' protection representation dated 06.06.2026 strictly in accordance with Punjab's Standard Operating Procedures (Notification dated 23.1.2025), without commenting on the petition's veracity, leaving factual verification to the concerned authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/6956/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of a petition by two majors (Jyoti and Raj Kamal) seeking protection of life and liberty after their marriage on 06.06.2026, which faced opposition from relatives. The court directed respondent No.3 to decide the petitioners' protection representation dated 06.06.2026 strictly in accordance with Punjab's Standard Operating Procedures (Notification dated 23.1.2025), without commenting on the petition's veracity, leaving factual verification to the concerned authority. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case