LOVEJEET SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER — CRM-M/33509/2026
Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th June 2026.
CNR: PHHC011004262026
Filing Number
CRM-M/47436/2026
Filing Date
09-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/33509/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil
Coram
Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--ALLOWED
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.LOVEJEET SINGH
Adv. LS SIDHU
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA
-
3.SATPAL
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Lovejeet Singh, a licensed immigration consultant accused of fraud and violating the Immigration Act. The court found insufficient incriminating evidence connecting Singh to alleged fraud, determined custodial interrogation unnecessary, and rejected the state's argument that pending cases warranted bail denial, holding that evidence must be evaluated per case individually. Singh was released on bail subject to joining investigation within one week and standard conditions including availability for interrogation and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
09-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/33509/2026
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted anticipatory bail to Lovejeet Singh, a licensed immigration consultant accused of fraud and violating the Immigration Act. The court found insufficient incriminating evidence connecting Singh to alleged fraud, determined custodial interrogation unnecessary, and rejected the state's argument that pending cases warranted bail denial, holding that evidence must be evaluated per case individually. Singh was released on bail subject to joining investigation within one week and standard conditions including availability for interrogation and restrictions on leaving India. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts