SUBHASH CHANDER vs FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) PUNJAB AND ORS — CWP/28523/2018

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 12-Nov-2018

CNR: PHHC011004052018

Filing Number

CWP/28523/2018

Filing Date

02-Nov-2018

Registration No

CWP/28523/2018

Registration Date

02-Nov-2018

Judge

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Coram

Mr. Justice Harsh Bunger

Bench Type

Single

Category

18.11 - LAND LAWS S.B. ( 448 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASH CHANDER

    Adv. KRISHAN SINGH DADWAL

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER (APPEALS) PUNJAB AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Harsh BungerView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana set aside all three orders in the Lambardar appointment case, finding that none of the authorities properly considered the statutory requirements under Rule 15 of the Punjab Land Revenue Rules 1909. The court remitted the matter to the Collector, Pathankot for fresh decision on merits within three months, directing the Collector to decide purely on candidates' qualifications without being influenced by previous orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Nov-2018

    Mr. Justice Tejinder Singh Dhindsa

  4. 12-Nov-2018

    —

    Mr Justice Rajiv Sharma

  5. 02-Nov-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/28523/2018

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana set aside all three orders in the Lambardar appointment case, finding that none of the authorities properly considered the statutory requirements under Rule 15 of the Punjab Land Revenue Rules 1909. The court remitted the matter to the Collector, Pathankot for fresh decision on merits within three months, directing the Collector to decide purely on candidates' qualifications without being influenced by previous orders. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case