PRIYANKA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CRWP/6923/2026
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th June 2026.
CNR: PHHC011000422026
Filing Number
CRWP/47183/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRWP/6923/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu
Coram
Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu
Category
47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.PRIYANKA AND ANOTHER
Adv. TARUN
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
-
2.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted protection to two major adults living in a live-in relationship against threats from their family members, holding that the fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 is sacrosanct and must be protected regardless of whether a relationship is formalized through marriage. The court directed the Superintendent of Police, Rohtak, to consider the petitioners' representation and take appropriate measures to ensure their safety, while clarifying that this order does not approve the legality of their relationship nor shield them from criminal proceedings if involved in cognizable offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRWP/6923/2026
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted protection to two major adults living in a live-in relationship against threats from their family members, holding that the fundamental right to life and liberty under Article 21 is sacrosanct and must be protected regardless of whether a relationship is formalized through marriage. The court directed the Superintendent of Police, Rohtak, to consider the petitioners' representation and take appropriate measures to ensure their safety, while clarifying that this order does not approve the legality of their relationship nor shield them from criminal proceedings if involved in cognizable offences. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts