ASHIQ KHAN vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/33549/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC011000312026

Filing Number

CRM-M/47186/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/33549/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ASHIQ KHAN

    Adv. HARSHIT AHUJA

  2. 2.ASHIQ KHAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.ASHIQ KHAN

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-33549/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Ashiq Khan in an NDPS Act case. The court found that no contraband was recovered from the petitioner—only 9.5 grams of non-commercial heroin was recovered from co-accused persons based on their disclosure statements. Given the absence of recovery from the petitioner, his willingness to cooperate with investigation, and the non-commercial nature of the drug involved, the court held custodial interrogation unnecessary and granted bail subject to joining investigation within one week and furnishing bonds under Section 482 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/33549/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-33549/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Ashiq Khan in an NDPS Act case. The court found that no contraband was recovered from the petitioner—only 9.5 grams of non-commercial heroin was recovered from co-accused persons based on their disclosure statements. Given the absence of recovery from the petitioner, his willingness to cooperate with investigation, and the non-commercial nature of the drug involved, the court held custodial interrogation unnecessary and granted bail subject to joining investigation within one week and furnishing bonds under Section 482 BNSS. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case