RAMANJOT AND ANR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. — CRWP/6974/2026
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th June 2026.
CNR: PHHC010999322026
Filing Number
CRWP/47087/2026
Filing Date
08-Jun-2026
Registration No
CRWP/6974/2026
Registration Date
09-Jun-2026
Judge
Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu
Coram
Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu
Category
47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
11-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 13-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.RAMANJOT AND ANR
Adv. DAVINDER PAL SONI JOURA
-
2.RAMANJOT
-
3.JATINDER KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.
-
2.RAMANJOT
-
3.JATINDER KUMAR
-
4.SHO (Station House Officer)
-
5.SATNAM SINGH
-
6.RAJ KUMAR
-
7.KIRNA RANI
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
11-Jun-2026
Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted protection of life and liberty to two adults living in a live-in relationship against family members' threats. Justice Mandeep Pannu held that constitutional rights to life and liberty are paramount regardless of relationship formalization, noting live-in relationships are lawful and deserve equal legal protection as married couples. The court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur to address the petitioners' threat perception while clarifying the order neither endorses the relationship's legality nor provides immunity from criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
08-Jun-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRWP/6974/2026
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted protection of life and liberty to two adults living in a live-in relationship against family members' threats. Justice Mandeep Pannu held that constitutional rights to life and liberty are paramount regardless of relationship formalization, noting live-in relationships are lawful and deserve equal legal protection as married couples. The court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, Sangrur to address the petitioners' threat perception while clarifying the order neither endorses the relationship's legality nor provides immunity from criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts