EHC SANJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS — CWP/19052/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 10th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Jun-2026

CNR: PHHC010999232026

e-Filing Number

07-06-2026

Filing Number

CWP/37193/2026

Filing Date

08-Jun-2026

Registration No

CWP/19052/2026

Registration Date

08-Jun-2026

Judge

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Coram

Ms. Justice Mandeep Pannu

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.21 - SERVICE-HARYANA POLICE ( 713 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

10-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226/227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.EHC SANJAY KUMAR AND OTHERS

    Adv. BALKAR SINGH

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.EHC Anup Singh

  4. 4.L EHC Mukesh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

  2. 2.State of Haryana and others

  3. 3.EHC Anup Singh

  4. 4.L EHC Mukesh

  5. 5.Commissioner of Police, Rohtak

  6. 6.Superintendent of Police GRP Ambala

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 10-Jun-2026

    Ms. Justice Mandeep PannuView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition challenging the selection of petitioners for the Lower School Course B-1 (2024), relying on its earlier precedent in EHC Sandeep Kumar's case establishing that employees cannot be compelled to undergo such courses. The court directed the State of Haryana to reconsider the petitioners' case in light of that binding precedent, effectively granting relief to those unwilling to undertake the mandatory course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 08-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/19052/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of the writ petition challenging the selection of petitioners for the Lower School Course B-1 (2024), relying on its earlier precedent in EHC Sandeep Kumar's case establishing that employees cannot be compelled to undergo such courses. The court directed the State of Haryana to reconsider the petitioners' case in light of that binding precedent, effectively granting relief to those unwilling to undertake the mandatory course. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case