OM PARKASH vs PUNJAB STATE POWER CORP LTD AND ANR — CWP/29464/2017

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010995412017

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

21st December 2017

Filing Number

CWP/29464/2017

Filing Date

19-12-2017

Registration No

CWP/29464/2017

Registration Date

20-12-2017

Judge

MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Coram

MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

20.5 - SC OSB (PUNJAB) RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 467 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

OM PARKASH

Adv. ALISHA ARORA

Respondent(s)

PUNJAB STATE POWER CORP LTD AND ANR

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

21-12-2017
19-09-2018
06-04-2018

Orders

21-12-2017

MRS JUSTICE DAYA CHAUDHARY

06-04-2018

MR. JUSTICE JITENDRA CHAUHAN

19-09-2018

MR JUSTICE JASWANT SINGH

12-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Summary of CWP-29464-2017 (Om Parkash v. Punjab State Power Corp Ltd) The High Court dismissed Om Parkash's petition seeking gratuity with 18% interest and pension regularization. Parkash, convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act in 2005, was denied full retirement benefits when retiring in 2009; though a civil suit in 2014 partly succeeded in securing 66.67% provisional pension, gratuity remained withheld pending appeal conclusion. The Court held Parkash's substantial delay in submitting the conviction judgment (until October 2018) was inexcusable, attributable solely to him rather than the employer, precluding interest claims. Furthermore, the petition itself was barred by delay and laches, having been filed years after retirement without compelling justification, invoking the principle that "delay defeats equity" and discretionary writ remedies cannot be enforced after unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP-29464-2017 (Om Parkash v. Punjab State Power Corp Ltd) The High Court dismissed Om Parkash's petition seeking gratuity with 18% interest and pension regularization. Parkash, convicted under the Prevention of Corruption Act in 2005, was denied full retirement benefits when retiring in 2009; though a civil suit in 2014 partly succeeded in securing 66.67% provisional pension, gratuity remained withheld pending appeal conclusion. The Court held Parkash's substantial delay in submitting the conviction judgment (until October 2018) was inexcusable, attributable solely to him rather than the employer, precluding interest claims. Furthermore, the petition itself was barred by delay and laches, having been filed years after retirement without compelling justification, invoking the principle that "delay defeats equity" and discretionary writ remedies cannot be enforced after unreasonable delay. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case