THANA SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/33120/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010993812026

Filing Number

CRM-M/46750/2026

Filing Date

04-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/33120/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.THANA SINGH

    Adv. MR. SHWAS BAJAJ

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-33120/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Thana Singh in a theft and possession case. The court found that since co-accused persons with actual recoveries had been granted bail, no recovery was made from the petitioner, and the trial was in early stages with charges yet to be framed, continued detention was unjustified. The State's objection based on the petitioner's involvement in other cases was rejected, as criminal antecedents alone cannot justify bail denial when evidence in the specific case must be evaluated independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/33120/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-33120/2026 Court Decision: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to petitioner Thana Singh in a theft and possession case. The court found that since co-accused persons with actual recoveries had been granted bail, no recovery was made from the petitioner, and the trial was in early stages with charges yet to be framed, continued detention was unjustified. The State's objection based on the petitioner's involvement in other cases was rejected, as criminal antecedents alone cannot justify bail denial when evidence in the specific case must be evaluated independently. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case