M/S MHI ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS INDIA PVT LTD vs TULESHWAR PRASAD, ADDL. COMMISSIONER CGST, GURUGRAMAND ANOTHER — COCP/2368/2023

Case under Contempt of Courts Act Section 12. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010991912023

Filing Number

COCP/39924/2023

Filing Date

04-Aug-2023

Registration No

COCP/2368/2023

Registration Date

08-Aug-2023

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

Contempt of Courts Act Section 12

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S MHI ENGINEERING AND INDUSTRIAL PROJECTS INDIA PVT LTD

    Adv. ROHIT SUD

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.TULESHWAR PRASAD, ADDL. COMMISSIONER CGST, GURUGRAMAND ANOTHER

  2. 2.DILBAGH SINGH, DC, DIVISION EAST I, GST, GURUGRAM

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    Summary of COCP/2368/2023: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed MHI Engineering's contempt petition, which alleged deliberate disobedience of a May 31, 2023 court order. The dismissal was based on a Division Bench stay order (dated May 23, 2025) in a related case (CACP-41-2025) that halted further contempt proceedings. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue available remedies after the related appeal's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 04-Aug-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/2368/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of COCP/2368/2023: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed MHI Engineering's contempt petition, which alleged deliberate disobedience of a May 31, 2023 court order. The dismissal was based on a Division Bench stay order (dated May 23, 2025) in a related case (CACP-41-2025) that halted further contempt proceedings. The petitioner was granted liberty to pursue available remedies after the related appeal's decision. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case