LAKHWINDER SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/32942/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010989922026

Filing Number

CRM-M/46519/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/32942/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LAKHWINDER SINGH

    Adv. KARANDEEP SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Lakhwinder Singh's second anticipatory bail petition (CRM-M-32942-2026) filed on June 5, 2026. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in FIR No. 0080 (dated July 17, 2024) involving charges under BNS sections relating to alleged premeditated attack. Justice Sanjay Vashisth dismissed the petition because: (1) no counsel appeared for the petitioner on the hearing date, and (2) the second anticipatory bail petition was not maintainable, as a prior petition (CRM-M-47564-2024) had already been dismissed on October 1, 2024 when the court was not inclined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/32942/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Lakhwinder Singh's second anticipatory bail petition (CRM-M-32942-2026) filed on June 5, 2026. The petitioner sought anticipatory bail in FIR No. 0080 (dated July 17, 2024) involving charges under BNS sections relating to alleged premeditated attack. Justice Sanjay Vashisth dismissed the petition because: (1) no counsel appeared for the petitioner on the hearing date, and (2) the second anticipatory bail petition was not maintainable, as a prior petition (CRM-M-47564-2024) had already been dismissed on October 1, 2024 when the court was not inclined to grant bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case