DEVENDER SINGH RAUTELA vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/32943/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010989642026

Filing Number

CRM-M/46476/2026

Filing Date

03-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/32943/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVENDER SINGH RAUTELA

    Adv. SUBE S KAUSHIK

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Devender Singh Rautela in FIR No. 0048 (cheating, criminal breach of trust, intimidation charges) filed at Police Station Tosham, Bhiwani. The court found that the petitioner was neither a signatory to the alleged agreement nor a beneficiary of the transaction, as funds were credited to others' accounts, and ruled that multiple FIRs against the company cannot justify bail denial in an independent case. Bail was granted subject to joining investigation within 10 days and furnishing bonds, with automatic cancellation if the petitioner fails to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 03-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/32943/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Devender Singh Rautela in FIR No. 0048 (cheating, criminal breach of trust, intimidation charges) filed at Police Station Tosham, Bhiwani. The court found that the petitioner was neither a signatory to the alleged agreement nor a beneficiary of the transaction, as funds were credited to others' accounts, and ruled that multiple FIRs against the company cannot justify bail denial in an independent case. Bail was granted subject to joining investigation within 10 days and furnishing bonds, with automatic cancellation if the petitioner fails to comply. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case