SUBHASH AGGARWAL AND ORS vs UNION TERRITORY AND ORS — CWP/18967/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 05-Jun-2026

CNR: PHHC010987842026

e-Filing Number

02-06-2026

Filing Number

CWP/36850/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

CWP/18967/2026

Registration Date

04-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor

Coram

Mr. Justice Rohit Kapoor

Category

31.2 - MUNICIPAL & PANCHAYAT LAWS ( 559 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASH AGGARWAL AND ORS

    Adv. SUBHASH AGGARWAL

  2. 2.Union Territory and ors

  3. 3.Arun Puri

  4. 4.Sandeep Jain

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UNION TERRITORY AND ORS

  2. 2.Union Territory and ors

  3. 3.Arun Puri

  4. 4.Sandeep Jain

  5. 5.SDO

  6. 6.JE Junior Engineer

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Rohit KapoorView PDF

    Summary: Petitioners sought a mandamus writ to restore water supply to Sector 21-C, Chandigarh, which had been temporarily disrupted. The Municipal Corporation's Public Health Water Supply Division submitted that the interruption was due to necessary repair works and that water supply was gradually improving and expected to return to normal shortly. The petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to re-approach the court if the grievance persisted. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with such liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/18967/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: Petitioners sought a mandamus writ to restore water supply to Sector 21-C, Chandigarh, which had been temporarily disrupted. The Municipal Corporation's Public Health Water Supply Division submitted that the interruption was due to necessary repair works and that water supply was gradually improving and expected to return to normal shortly. The petitioner sought withdrawal of the petition with liberty to re-approach the court if the grievance persisted. The court dismissed the petition as withdrawn with such liberty. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case