JAGDEEP SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/32958/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010987562026

Filing Number

CRM-M/46357/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/32958/2026

Registration Date

03-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JAGDEEP SINGH

    Adv. NAVDEEP SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Jagdeep Singh in a theft case involving stolen items from a Gram Panchayat office, finding that Singh was implicated solely based on a co-accused's disclosure statement and was not initially named in the FIR, with all stolen articles recovered from the co-accused rather than Singh. The court imposed conditions requiring Singh to join the investigation within 10 days, furnish personal/surety bonds, and comply with standard bail restrictions including availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/32958/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Jagdeep Singh in a theft case involving stolen items from a Gram Panchayat office, finding that Singh was implicated solely based on a co-accused's disclosure statement and was not initially named in the FIR, with all stolen articles recovered from the co-accused rather than Singh. The court imposed conditions requiring Singh to join the investigation within 10 days, furnish personal/surety bonds, and comply with standard bail restrictions including availability for interrogation and non-interference with witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case