ABHIMANYU KUMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/33519/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 16th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010987142026

Filing Number

CRM-M/46344/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/33519/2026

Registration Date

09-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Vinod S. Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

16-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 17-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHIMANYU KUMAR

    Adv. RAVINDER MALIK

  2. 2.ABHIMANYU KUMAR @ MONU

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.ABHIMANYU KUMAR @ MONU

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 16-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Vinod S. BhardwajView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Abhimanyu Kumar in a narcotic drugs case (NDPS Act Section 20(C)) on June 16, 2026, after he had undergone approximately 9 months of custody since September 2, 2025. The court's decision was influenced by: (1) the substantial period of custody already served; (2) the stage of trial; and (3) parity with his co-accused Mukesh Kumar Sharma, who had previously been granted bail by the court. The petitioner was released on furnishing bail/surety bonds with conditions against threatening or influencing prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/33519/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab & Haryana granted regular bail to Abhimanyu Kumar in a narcotic drugs case (NDPS Act Section 20(C)) on June 16, 2026, after he had undergone approximately 9 months of custody since September 2, 2025. The court's decision was influenced by: (1) the substantial period of custody already served; (2) the stage of trial; and (3) parity with his co-accused Mukesh Kumar Sharma, who had previously been granted bail by the court. The petitioner was released on furnishing bail/surety bonds with conditions against threatening or influencing prosecution witnesses. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case