LOVE GILL vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/32837/2026

Disposed: --DISMISSED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010986902026

Filing Number

CRM-M/46324/2026

Filing Date

02-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/32837/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Coram

Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.LOVE GILL

    Adv. HARSHDEEP SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Sanjay VashisthView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Love Gill's petition for anticipatory bail in a case involving the alleged brutal assault of Monika Kalyan on 19.12.2025. The court found that the complainant had specifically named the petitioner in her supplementary statement and that he was also mentioned in a co-accused's disclosure statement, making his denials of presence or injury attribution unconvincing at the bail stage. The court rejected the bail plea considering the gravity of allegations, the victim's sustained 13 injuries (6 grievous), and the physical and mental trauma suffered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 02-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/32837/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Love Gill's petition for anticipatory bail in a case involving the alleged brutal assault of Monika Kalyan on 19.12.2025. The court found that the complainant had specifically named the petitioner in her supplementary statement and that he was also mentioned in a co-accused's disclosure statement, making his denials of presence or injury attribution unconvincing at the bail stage. The court rejected the bail plea considering the gravity of allegations, the victim's sustained 13 injuries (6 grievous), and the physical and mental trauma suffered. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case