ABHINAV TAKSHAK vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/32776/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010985562026

Filing Number

CRM-M/46233/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/32776/2026

Registration Date

02-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.ABHINAV TAKSHAK

    Adv. ADITYA SANGHI

  2. 2.ABHINAV TAKSHAK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.ABHINAV TAKSHAK

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Abhinav Takshak, a government clerk accused of issuing NOCs without required PTT-5 certificates in a vehicle registration fraud case involving Rs. 73.56 lakh loss. The court found insufficient grounds for custodial interrogation, noting the allegations arose from official duties based on documentary evidence, with only seven files attributed to the petitioner and no personal gain or forgery specifically alleged. Bail was conditional on joining the investigation within 10 days and complying with standard bail conditions, with automatic cancellation if the petitioner failed to appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/32776/2026

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted anticipatory bail to Abhinav Takshak, a government clerk accused of issuing NOCs without required PTT-5 certificates in a vehicle registration fraud case involving Rs. 73.56 lakh loss. The court found insufficient grounds for custodial interrogation, noting the allegations arose from official duties based on documentary evidence, with only seven files attributed to the petitioner and no personal gain or forgery specifically alleged. Bail was conditional on joining the investigation within 10 days and complying with standard bail conditions, with automatic cancellation if the petitioner failed to appear. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case