YADWINDER KUMAR SHARMA vs STATE ELECTION COMMISSION PUNJAB AND ORS — CWP/18820/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226 227. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-Jun-2026

CNR: PHHC010984472026

e-Filing Number

01-06-2026

Filing Number

CWP/36741/2026

Filing Date

01-Jun-2026

Registration No

CWP/18820/2026

Registration Date

01-Jun-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj , Justice (To Be Nominated)

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj , Justice (To Be Nominated)

Bench Type

Double

Category

7 - ELECTION MATTERS ( 403 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226 227

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.YADWINDER KUMAR SHARMA

    Adv. SIMRANJEET SINGH SARWARA

  2. 2.State of punjab

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE ELECTION COMMISSION PUNJAB AND ORS

  2. 2.State of punjab

  3. 3.State election commission

  4. 4.The Deputy Commissioner cum District Electoral officers

  5. 5.Block development panchayat officer

  6. 6.Rajinder singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj,justice (To Be Nominated)View PDF

    Summary of CWP No. 18820/2026 Petitioner Yadwinder Kumar Sharma sought preservation of ballot papers and election records for Ward No. 19, Municipal Council Zirakpur, and a vote recount, alleging he secured 853 votes versus the declared APP winner's 830 votes. After the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal to pursue alternative remedies, the court allowed the petition to be withdrawn with liberty to avail other legal remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Jun-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/18820/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP No. 18820/2026 Petitioner Yadwinder Kumar Sharma sought preservation of ballot papers and election records for Ward No. 19, Municipal Council Zirakpur, and a vote recount, alleging he secured 853 votes versus the declared APP winner's 830 votes. After the petitioner's counsel sought withdrawal to pursue alternative remedies, the court allowed the petition to be withdrawn with liberty to avail other legal remedies available under law. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case