MS MASTER STONE CRUSHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/18814/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 03rd June 2026.
CNR: PHHC010982102026
e-Filing Number
30-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/36643/2026
Filing Date
30-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/18814/2026
Registration Date
01-Jun-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth , Justice (To Be Nominated)
Coram
Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth , Justice (To Be Nominated)
Category
18.13 - MINES AND MINERALS ( 450 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
03-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 05-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.MS MASTER STONE CRUSHER
Adv. TUSHAAR MADAAN
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
3.The Director, Department of Mines and Geology
-
4.The Superintending Engineer, Rupnagar
-
5.The Executive Engineer Drainage cum District Mining Officer
-
6.The Sub Divisional Officer cum Assistant District Mining Officer
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
03-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Sanjay Vashisth,justice (To Be Nominated)View PDF
Summary of CWP-18814-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of M/s Master Stone Crusher's writ petition challenging demand notices dated 24.02.2026 and 07.01.2026 issued by Punjab's Mining Department, following a coordinate bench judgment in similar cases. The court quashed the demand notices, finding the State failed to follow mandatory procedural requirements under Rule 85 of the 2013 Rules and Crusher Policy 2023, including passing proper assessment orders and providing petitioner reasonable opportunity of hearing before raising demands. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/18814/2026
Summary of CWP-18814-2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of M/s Master Stone Crusher's writ petition challenging demand notices dated 24.02.2026 and 07.01.2026 issued by Punjab's Mining Department, following a coordinate bench judgment in similar cases. The court quashed the demand notices, finding the State failed to follow mandatory procedural requirements under Rule 85 of the 2013 Rules and Crusher Policy 2023, including passing proper assessment orders and providing petitioner reasonable opportunity of hearing before raising demands. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts