SH ARVINDER SINGH BILLING vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CWP/18735/2026
Case under Constitution of India Section 226/227. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: PHHC010980742026
e-Filing Number
30-05-2026
Filing Number
CWP/36571/2026
Filing Date
30-May-2026
Registration No
CWP/18735/2026
Registration Date
30-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja
Coram
Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
63.65 - CASE REL TO ELE OF SOCI RUN SCH,COL,UNI & PVT ORG ( 758 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SH ARVINDER SINGH BILLING
Adv. IPS ISSAR
-
2.State of Punjab and others
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS
-
2.State of Punjab and others
-
3.Deputy Commissioner
-
4.Sub Divisional Magistrate, Derabassi,
-
5.Trishla City Residents Welfare Association,
-
6.Ms Trishla Buildtech Pvt Ltd
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF
The High Court disposed of the writ petition without deciding its merits, instead directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Respondent No. 3) to expeditiously decide the petitioner's representations regarding the election committee constitution for Trishla City Residents' Welfare Association elections. The court accepted the petitioner's request for expedited consideration of his representations and reserved the petitioner's right to challenge any subsequent order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
30-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/18735/2026
The High Court disposed of the writ petition without deciding its merits, instead directing the Sub Divisional Magistrate (Respondent No. 3) to expeditiously decide the petitioner's representations regarding the election committee constitution for Trishla City Residents' Welfare Association elections. The court accepted the petitioner's request for expedited consideration of his representations and reserved the petitioner's right to challenge any subsequent order. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts