SHAMSHER SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/32311/2026
Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.
CNR: PHHC010970412026
Filing Number
CRM-M/45483/2026
Filing Date
29-May-2026
Registration No
CRM-M/32311/2026
Registration Date
29-May-2026
Judge
Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja
Coram
Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja
Bench Type
Single
Category
99 ( 945 )
Sub-Category
40.17 - REGULAR BAIL PUNJAB (AGNST WOMEN) ( 286 )
Judicial Branch
CRIMINAL BRANCH
Decision Date
02-Jun-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISPOSED OF
Last updated 03-Jun-2026
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SHAMSHER SINGH
Adv. RAGHAV SONI
-
2.SHAMSHER SINGH
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF PUNJAB
-
2.SHAMSHER SINGH
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
02-Jun-2026
Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted interim regular bail for one month to Shamsher Singh, who was accused under Section 69 of BNS (rape) after allegedly establishing physical relations with the complainant on pretext of marriage. The court allowed the petition based on the complainant's consent and statement that she had no objection to his release, as both families amicably resolved the dispute and fixed their marriage for 06.06.2026. The petitioner was ordered released on furnishing adequate bail/surety bonds, with the court clarifying this order expressed no opinion on the case's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
29-May-2026
Case filed
Registration No. CRM-M/32311/2026
The Punjab and Haryana High Court granted interim regular bail for one month to Shamsher Singh, who was accused under Section 69 of BNS (rape) after allegedly establishing physical relations with the complainant on pretext of marriage. The court allowed the petition based on the complainant's consent and statement that she had no objection to his release, as both families amicably resolved the dispute and fixed their marriage for 06.06.2026. The petitioner was ordered released on furnishing adequate bail/surety bonds, with the court clarifying this order expressed no opinion on the case's merits. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts