BANDANA AND ANOTHER vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/6590/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010967292026

Filing Number

CRWP/45326/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

CRWP/6590/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Alok Jain

Coram

Mr. Justice Alok Jain

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.BANDANA AND ANOTHER

    Adv. VIRENDER SINGH

  2. 2.BANDANA

  3. 3.MANINDERR SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Alok JainView PDF

    CASE SUMMARY: CRWP 6590/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a petition by two major adults in a live-in relationship who sought protection of life and liberty from threats by private respondents (family members). Justice Alok Jain held that as the petitioners are majors, they have the right to lead their lives according to their volition, and private respondents have no authority to interfere. The court directed the Police Commissioner, Amritsar to consider the petitioners' representation dated 27.05.2026 and take appropriate action per established guidelines, subject to verification of documents and antecedents. The court clarified the order does not endorse the live-in relationship and does not shield petitioners from any criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/6590/2026

casestatus.in Summary

CASE SUMMARY: CRWP 6590/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of a petition by two major adults in a live-in relationship who sought protection of life and liberty from threats by private respondents (family members). Justice Alok Jain held that as the petitioners are majors, they have the right to lead their lives according to their volition, and private respondents have no authority to interfere. The court directed the Police Commissioner, Amritsar to consider the petitioners' representation dated 27.05.2026 and take appropriate action per established guidelines, subject to verification of documents and antecedents. The court clarified the order does not endorse the live-in relationship and does not shield petitioners from any criminal proceedings. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case