RAJDEE SINGH AND ANR vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS. — CRWP/6571/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 02nd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010966692026

Filing Number

CRWP/45292/2026

Filing Date

29-May-2026

Registration No

CRWP/6571/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Coram

Mr. Justice Harkesh Manuja

Category

47.5 - PROTECTION ( 195 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

02-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 03-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAJDEE SINGH AND ANR

    Adv. MAYUR SINGLA

  2. 2.RAJDEEP SINGH

  3. 3.MANPREET KAUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

  2. 2.RAJDEEP SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 02-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Harkesh ManujaView PDF

    Summary of CRWP No.6571 of 2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted protection to two major individuals (petitioners) who solemnized their marriage on 27.05.2026 against the wishes of respondent No.4. The court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Barnala to investigate threat perceptions and ensure the petitioners are not forcibly taken into custody based on allegations of kidnapping or rape. However, the court clarified this order does not express any opinion on the validity of the marriage and does not hinder criminal investigations against petitioner No.1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 29-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/6571/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CRWP No.6571 of 2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted protection to two major individuals (petitioners) who solemnized their marriage on 27.05.2026 against the wishes of respondent No.4. The court directed the Senior Superintendent of Police, District Barnala to investigate threat perceptions and ensure the petitioners are not forcibly taken into custody based on allegations of kidnapping or rape. However, the court clarified this order does not express any opinion on the validity of the marriage and does not hinder criminal investigations against petitioner No.1. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case