DEVI LAL vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR — CRM-M/33543/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010962302025

Filing Number

CRM-M/50454/2025

Filing Date

18-Jun-2025

Registration No

CRM-M/33543/2025

Registration Date

26-Jun-2025

Judge

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Coram

Mr. Justice H.S. Grewal

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

39 - ANTICIPATORY BAILS ( 144 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.DEVI LAL

    Adv. R S MAMLI

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ANR

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

  3. 3.GAJRAJ SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice H.S. GrewalView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M-33543/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Devi Lal's petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Gajraj Singh in an FIR involving criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal intimidation. The court found that while the investigation remains pending and no challan was filed, there was insufficient evidence that Gajraj Singh deliberately violated bail conditions, as he claimed availability but was never formally called for investigation. The court directed Gajraj Singh to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate within seven days to facilitate his joining the investigation under court supervision, rather than cancelling the bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 18-Jun-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/33543/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M-33543/2025 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Devi Lal's petition seeking cancellation of anticipatory bail granted to Gajraj Singh in an FIR involving criminal breach of trust, cheating, and criminal intimidation. The court found that while the investigation remains pending and no challan was filed, there was insufficient evidence that Gajraj Singh deliberately violated bail conditions, as he claimed availability but was never formally called for investigation. The court directed Gajraj Singh to appear before the Illaqa Magistrate within seven days to facilitate his joining the investigation under court supervision, rather than cancelling the bail. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case