DARSHAN SINGH vs UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ANOTHER — CWP/26227/2017

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.

CNR: PHHC010959642017

CASE DISPOSED

Next Hearing

16th November 2017

Filing Number

CWP/26227/2017

Filing Date

15-11-2017

Registration No

CWP/26227/2017

Registration Date

15-11-2017

Judge

MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Coram

MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Bench Type

Single

Category

20.11 - SCOSB (HARYANA) ( 453 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12th May 2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISMISSED

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

DARSHAN SINGH

Adv. SANGITA DHANDA

Respondent(s)

UTTAR HARYANA BIJLI VITRAN NIGAM AND ANOTHER

Hearing History

Judge: MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

16-11-2017
30-07-2018
15-05-2018
19-01-2018

Orders

16-11-2017

MR. JUSTICE GURMEET SINGH SANDHAWALIA

30-07-2018

MS. JUSTICE RITU BAHRI

12-05-2026
MR. JUSTICE HARPREET SINGH BRAR

Summary of CWP-26227-2017 (Darshan Singh v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.) The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed three consolidated writ petitions seeking appointment as Assistant Lineman from an expired waiting list. The court held that the waiting list from a 2008 advertisement expired in April 2011 per 1988 Haryana Government instructions, and candidates had no vested right to appointment after expiry. The petitioner's claim was barred by delay and laches, having approached the court in August 2018—over seven years later—and the court rejected parity arguments based on earlier single-bench judgments, which a Division Bench had already distinguished and confined to specific facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

casestatus.in Summary

Summary of CWP-26227-2017 (Darshan Singh v. Uttar Haryana Bijli Vitran Nigam Ltd.) The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed three consolidated writ petitions seeking appointment as Assistant Lineman from an expired waiting list. The court held that the waiting list from a 2008 advertisement expired in April 2011 per 1988 Haryana Government instructions, and candidates had no vested right to appointment after expiry. The petitioner's claim was barred by delay and laches, having approached the court in August 2018—over seven years later—and the court rejected parity arguments based on earlier single-bench judgments, which a Division Bench had already distinguished and confined to specific facts. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Browse Related Cases

Cases under same legislation

Explore other courts

Search Another Case