SHINDER SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/32465/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 05th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010952342026

Filing Number

CRM-M/44684/2026

Filing Date

27-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/32465/2026

Registration Date

30-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Coram

Mr. Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

05-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 06-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SHINDER SINGH

    Adv. PARMINDER SINGH

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.STATE OF HARYANA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 05-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Rajesh BhardwajView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/32465/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Shinder Singh, a 70-year-old prostate cancer patient arrested for alleged possession of 1,575 Alprazolam tablets under the NDPS Act. The court found that Singh had been incarcerated for over seven months with no prior criminal record, and considered his age and health conditions alongside the principle that speedy trial is a fundamental right. Although the state contended the recovery fell under commercial quantity provisions, Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj held that prolonged pretrial detention without trial conclusion causes immeasurable injustice, especially under stringent drug laws, and granted bail on furnishing surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/32465/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/32465/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Shinder Singh, a 70-year-old prostate cancer patient arrested for alleged possession of 1,575 Alprazolam tablets under the NDPS Act. The court found that Singh had been incarcerated for over seven months with no prior criminal record, and considered his age and health conditions alongside the principle that speedy trial is a fundamental right. Although the state contended the recovery fell under commercial quantity provisions, Justice Rajesh Bhardwaj held that prolonged pretrial detention without trial conclusion causes immeasurable injustice, especially under stringent drug laws, and granted bail on furnishing surety bonds. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case