M/S JAY ESS ENTERPRISES vs THE SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY CUM FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER CORPORATION AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CWP/19616/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 01-Sep-2022

CNR: PHHC010948952022

Filing Number

CWP/38049/2022

Filing Date

26-Aug-2022

Registration No

CWP/19616/2022

Registration Date

31-Aug-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Single

Category

55 - COOPERATIVE ACT MATTERS ( 697 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S JAY ESS ENTERPRISES

    Adv. TUSHAR SHARMA I

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.THE SPECIAL CHIEF SECRETARY CUM FINANCIAL COMMISSIONER CORPORATION AND ANOTHER Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.REGISTRAR COOPERATIVE SOCIETIES PUNJAB

  3. 3.THE HINDU COOPERATIVE BANK LTD

  4. 4.SEEMA SHARMA

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition filed by M/S Jay Ess Enterprises as infructuous after The Hindu Cooperative Bank (respondent No.3) presented a certificate confirming that the petitioner's One Time Settlement offer had been accepted and fully repaid, with the loan account closed. The petitioner's counsel did not dispute this assertion, leading to the dismissal of the petition as the relief sought had been rendered moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 01-Sep-2022

    Other

  4. 26-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/19616/2022

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed the writ petition filed by M/S Jay Ess Enterprises as infructuous after The Hindu Cooperative Bank (respondent No.3) presented a certificate confirming that the petitioner's One Time Settlement offer had been accepted and fully repaid, with the loan account closed. The petitioner's counsel did not dispute this assertion, leading to the dismissal of the petition as the relief sought had been rendered moot. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case