SIDHARTHA SEN vs DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CHANDIGARH AND ORS Advocate - Satya Pal Jain (Sr. Adv.) — CWP/16336/2023

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 31-Jul-2023

CNR: PHHC010943142023

Filing Number

CWP/37978/2023

Filing Date

27-Jul-2023

Registration No

CWP/16336/2023

Registration Date

28-Jul-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal , Ms. Justice Lapita Banerji

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal , Ms. Justice Lapita Banerji

Bench Type

Double

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SIDHARTHA SEN

    Adv. RISHAB SINGLA

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.DEPUTY COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX, TDS CHANDIGARH AND ORS Advocate - Satya Pal Jain (Sr. Adv.)

  2. 2.COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

  3. 3.ASST COMMISSIONER OF INCOME TAX

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak Sibal,ms. Justice Lapita BanerjiView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed petitioner Sidhartha Sen's petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to pursue a pending statutory appeal. During the petition's pendency, a final income tax assessment order was passed against the petitioner, rendering the writ petition premature; the court allowed withdrawal so the petitioner could pursue the appropriate appellate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Jul-2023

    Other

  4. 27-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/16336/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed petitioner Sidhartha Sen's petition as withdrawn, granting liberty to pursue a pending statutory appeal. During the petition's pendency, a final income tax assessment order was passed against the petitioner, rendering the writ petition premature; the court allowed withdrawal so the petitioner could pursue the appropriate appellate remedy. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case