KAMAL KANT DEWAN AND ANOTHER vs M/S BDS COMMISSION AGENT AND OTHERS — CRM-M/37062/2023

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010942292023

Filing Number

CRM-M/56273/2023

Filing Date

26-Jul-2023

Registration No

CRM-M/37062/2023

Registration Date

29-Jul-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Coram

Mr. Justice Subhas Mehla

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.3 - PROCEEDING STAYED IN QUASHING ( 197 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KAMAL KANT DEWAN AND ANOTHER

    Adv. ADITYA GROVER

  2. 2.MOHIT DEWAN

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S BDS COMMISSION AGENT AND OTHERS

  2. 2.HARJINDER KAUR

  3. 3.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Subhas MehlaView PDF

    The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of four consolidated criminal miscellaneous petitions filed by Kamal Kant Dewan and Mohit Dewan challenging a magistrate's order declining their exemption from personal appearance and issuing non-bailable arrest warrants in a Negotiable Instruments Act case. The court directed the petitioners to surrender before the trial court within two weeks and file appropriate bail applications with all pleas regarding their absence, with the trial court to decide in accordance with law; pending surrender, no arrest would be made, but relief would be withdrawn if they failed to appear within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/37062/2023

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court of Punjab and Haryana disposed of four consolidated criminal miscellaneous petitions filed by Kamal Kant Dewan and Mohit Dewan challenging a magistrate's order declining their exemption from personal appearance and issuing non-bailable arrest warrants in a Negotiable Instruments Act case. The court directed the petitioners to surrender before the trial court within two weeks and file appropriate bail applications with all pleas regarding their absence, with the trial court to decide in accordance with law; pending surrender, no arrest would be made, but relief would be withdrawn if they failed to appear within the stipulated period. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case