PAHLAD SINGH vs STATE OF HARYANA — CRM-M/31551/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 11th June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010938252026

Filing Number

CRM-M/44132/2026

Filing Date

26-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/31551/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepak Gupta

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.2 - REGULAR BAIL (HARYANA) ( 219 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

11-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 13-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PAHLAD SINGH

    Adv. HITESH PANDIT

  2. 2.PAHLAD SINGH

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA

  2. 2.PAHLAD SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepak GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M/31551/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Pahlad Singh in an NDPS Act case (FIR No.33/2025) involving 1 kg 360 grams of charas. The petitioner was nominated as a supplier solely based on a co-accused's disclosure statement, with no recovery effected from him, no mention in the FIR, and no other evidence against him. Justice Deepak Gupta accepted the petition, ordering his release on bail with bonds after five months of custody, noting that the State counsel conceded the weak case against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/31551/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M/31551/2026 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana granted regular bail to Pahlad Singh in an NDPS Act case (FIR No.33/2025) involving 1 kg 360 grams of charas. The petitioner was nominated as a supplier solely based on a co-accused's disclosure statement, with no recovery effected from him, no mention in the FIR, and no other evidence against him. Justice Deepak Gupta accepted the petition, ordering his release on bail with bonds after five months of custody, noting that the State counsel conceded the weak case against the petitioner. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case