MANPREET SINGH AND ANOTHER vs KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK AND ANOTHER — CWP/17831/2026

Case under Constitution of India Section 226. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 08th June 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 29-May-2026

CNR: PHHC010929332026

e-Filing Number

25-05-2026

Filing Number

CWP/34047/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

CWP/17831/2026

Registration Date

26-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil , Justice (To Be Nominated)

Coram

Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil , Justice (To Be Nominated)

Bench Type

Double

Category

31.11 - FINANCIAL CORPORATION UOI D.B. ( 558 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

08-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 09-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 226

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.MANPREET SINGH AND ANOTHER

    Adv. Amit Puri

  2. 2.Manpreet Singh and another

  3. 3.Ranjeet Singh

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.KOTAK MAHINDRA BANK AND ANOTHER

  2. 2.Manpreet Singh and another

  3. 3.Ranjeet Singh

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 08-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil,justice (To Be Nominated)View PDF

    Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition filed by Manpreet Singh challenging Kotak Mahindra Bank's property sale/e-auction notice dated 15.04.2026. The court accepted the petitioner's withdrawal request after finding that the petitioner had concealed material facts—specifically, an earlier civil suit seeking injunction against the auction that was dismissed without interim relief. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/17831/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed the petition filed by Manpreet Singh challenging Kotak Mahindra Bank's property sale/e-auction notice dated 15.04.2026. The court accepted the petitioner's withdrawal request after finding that the petitioner had concealed material facts—specifically, an earlier civil suit seeking injunction against the auction that was dismissed without interim relief. The petition was dismissed as withdrawn. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case