RAVINDER KUMAR AND ORS vs UMED SINGH AND ORS — FAO/754/2010

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--ALLOWED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 03-May-2010

CNR: PHHC010922832010

Filing Number

FAO/754/2010

Filing Date

19-Feb-2010

Registration No

FAO/754/2010

Registration Date

19-Feb-2010

Judge

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Coram

Mrs. Justice Sudeepti Sharma

Bench Type

Single

Category

500.64 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 929 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.RAVINDER KUMAR AND ORS

    Adv. ARUN YADAV

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.UMED SINGH AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mrs. Justice Sudeepti SharmaView PDF

    Case Summary: FAO 754/2010 Court's Decision: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the appeal and enhanced the motor accident compensation from Rs. 1,40,000 to Rs. 5,94,044, with an additional Rs. 4,54,044 payable at 9% interest per annum from the petition date. The court corrected the tribunal's errors in assessing the deceased housewife's notional income at Rs. 5,000/month (not Rs. 2,100), applying multiplier 11 (not 8), including future prospects at 10%, and adding loss of consortium compensation at Rs. 80,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 09-Apr-2015

    Mr. Justice K.C. Puri

  4. 01-Sep-2014

    Ms. Justice Navita Singh

  5. 25-Jan-2011

    —

    Mr. Justice Mohinder Pal

  6. 01-Sep-2010

    —

    Mr. Justice Harbans Singh Rai

  7. 19-Jul-2010

    —

    Mr. Justice Harbans Singh Rai

  8. 03-May-2010

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  9. 19-Feb-2010

    Case filed

    Registration No. FAO/754/2010

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: FAO 754/2010 Court's Decision: The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the appeal and enhanced the motor accident compensation from Rs. 1,40,000 to Rs. 5,94,044, with an additional Rs. 4,54,044 payable at 9% interest per annum from the petition date. The court corrected the tribunal's errors in assessing the deceased housewife's notional income at Rs. 5,000/month (not Rs. 2,100), applying multiplier 11 (not 8), including future prospects at 10%, and adding loss of consortium compensation at Rs. 80,000. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case