GURDEEP SINGH ALIAS DEEP vs STATE OF PUNJAB — CRM-M/31810/2026

Disposed: --ALLOWED on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010920682026

Filing Number

CRM-M/43336/2026

Filing Date

25-May-2026

Registration No

CRM-M/31810/2026

Registration Date

27-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Coram

Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh

Bench Type

Single

Category

99 ( 945 )

Sub-Category

40.1 - REGULAR BAIL (PUNJAB) ( 220 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.GURDEEP SINGH ALIAS DEEP

    Adv. J.S. THAKUR

  2. 2.GURDEEP SINGH @ DEEP

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB

  2. 2.GURDEEP SINGH @ DEEP

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Surya Partap SinghView PDF

    Case Summary: CRM-M No. 31810/2026 Court Decision: The Punjab and Haryana High Court GRANTED bail to Gurdeep Singh @ Deep in an NDPS drug case. The court found that the sole evidence against him—a co-accused's police custody disclosure statement—is inadmissible and unreliable under evidence law. Since nothing was recovered from the petitioner's possession, the stringent bail conditions under NDPS Act Section 37 do not apply. The court emphasized the constitutional right to speedy trial, noting the petitioner had already served over one month in custody with investigation complete. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 25-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/31810/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRM-M No. 31810/2026 Court Decision: The Punjab and Haryana High Court GRANTED bail to Gurdeep Singh @ Deep in an NDPS drug case. The court found that the sole evidence against him—a co-accused's police custody disclosure statement—is inadmissible and unreliable under evidence law. Since nothing was recovered from the petitioner's possession, the stringent bail conditions under NDPS Act Section 37 do not apply. The court emphasized the constitutional right to speedy trial, noting the petitioner had already served over one month in custody with investigation complete. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case