M/S MICRONOVA POWER SYSTEM vs M/S BALAJI SALES CORPORATION — CRM-M/32712/2019

Case under No Acts Defined Section 1. Disposed: --ALLOWED on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010916502019

Filing Number

CRM-M/42922/2019

Filing Date

26-Jul-2019

Registration No

CRM-M/32712/2019

Registration Date

02-Aug-2019

Judge

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Coram

Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi

Bench Type

Single

Category

38.29 - QUASHING PET U/S 482 CRPC GEN IN U/S 138 NI ACT ( 649 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--ALLOWED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.M/S MICRONOVA POWER SYSTEM

    Adv. BIJENDER DHANKHAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.M/S BALAJI SALES CORPORATION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Jasjit Singh BediView PDF

    Summary: CRM-M/32712/2019 The Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed the Additional Sessions Judge's order that had rejected Micronova Power System's application to introduce late evidence (emails, cancellation reports, legal notice, and distributor forms) in its cheque bounce case against Balaji Sales Corporation. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi held that since these pre-existing documents were omitted only due to oversight and not fabricated to change the case nature, the respondent could adequately protect its interests through cross-examination without suffering irreparable prejudice. The trial court was directed to conclude proceedings within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Jul-2019

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRM-M/32712/2019

casestatus.in Summary

Summary: CRM-M/32712/2019 The Punjab and Haryana High Court quashed the Additional Sessions Judge's order that had rejected Micronova Power System's application to introduce late evidence (emails, cancellation reports, legal notice, and distributor forms) in its cheque bounce case against Balaji Sales Corporation. Justice Jasjit Singh Bedi held that since these pre-existing documents were omitted only due to oversight and not fabricated to change the case nature, the respondent could adequately protect its interests through cross-examination without suffering irreparable prejudice. The trial court was directed to conclude proceedings within three months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case