PUNEET MALHOTRA vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS — CRWP/6129/2026

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 03rd June 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010901512026

Filing Number

CRWP/42457/2026

Filing Date

22-May-2026

Registration No

CRWP/6129/2026

Registration Date

22-May-2026

Judge

Mr. Justice Alok Jain

Coram

Mr. Justice Alok Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

42.1 - CRIMINAL WRIT (HABEAS CORPUS) ( 311 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CRIMINAL BRANCH

Decision Date

03-Jun-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 05-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.PUNEET MALHOTRA

    Adv. Vivek Gupta

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

  2. 2.STATE OF PUNJAB

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 03-Jun-2026

    Mr. Justice Alok JainView PDF

    Case Summary: CRWP-6129-2026 Justice Alok Jain disposed of the habeas corpus petition after the petitioner's minor daughter was recovered and returned to him on 28.05.2026. The court directed authorities to investigate allegations against the investigating officer (recorded in the daughter's Section 164 statement) before the trial court. The court noted prima facie that the matter appeared to stem from adolescent affection between the detenue and respondent No.5 (a young boy), observing she had travelled voluntarily without seeking assistance despite alleged incidents, and reserved final merits assessment for the competent court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 22-May-2026

    Case filed

    Registration No. CRWP/6129/2026

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CRWP-6129-2026 Justice Alok Jain disposed of the habeas corpus petition after the petitioner's minor daughter was recovered and returned to him on 28.05.2026. The court directed authorities to investigate allegations against the investigating officer (recorded in the daughter's Section 164 statement) before the trial court. The court noted prima facie that the matter appeared to stem from adolescent affection between the detenue and respondent No.5 (a young boy), observing she had travelled voluntarily without seeking assistance despite alleged incidents, and reserved final merits assessment for the competent court. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case