HAZURA SINGH vs HAKAM SINGH AND ORS. — RSA/3105/2023

Case under Code of Civil Procedure Section 100. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 11th May 2026.

Case disposed

CNR: PHHC010891962023

Filing Number

RSA/36004/2023

Filing Date

17-Jul-2023

Registration No

RSA/3105/2023

Registration Date

30-Sep-2023

Judge

Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain

Coram

Mr. Justice Pankaj Jain

Bench Type

Single

Category

26 - RSA ( 496 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL II(RSA) BRANCH

Decision Date

11-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISMISSED

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Code of Civil Procedure Section 100

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.HAZURA SINGH

    Adv. PRITAM SINGH SAINI

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.HAKAM SINGH AND ORS.

  2. 2.HARCHAN SINGH TH LRS

  3. 3.JASWINDER SINGH

  4. 4.PUSHPINDER KAUR

  5. 5.HARDEEP SINGH

  6. 6.VIKRAM SINGH

  7. 7.RABINDER SINGH

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 11-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Pankaj JainView PDF

    Case Summary: Hazura Singh v. Hakam Singh and Ors. (RSA 3105/2023) The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Hazura Singh's second appeal challenging the lower courts' rejection of his claim for partition of ancestral houses in Ambala. The court found that the houses fell to defendant Hakam Singh's share through a valid family settlement, as Singh had constructed them from his own funds and maintained settled possession, while the plaintiff (residing in Mumbai) failed to prove the property's ancestral status. The court affirmed the lower courts' factual findings, noting second appeals cannot re-examine findings of fact absent legal error. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 17-Jul-2023

    Case filed

    Registration No. RSA/3105/2023

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: Hazura Singh v. Hakam Singh and Ors. (RSA 3105/2023) The Punjab and Haryana High Court dismissed Hazura Singh's second appeal challenging the lower courts' rejection of his claim for partition of ancestral houses in Ambala. The court found that the houses fell to defendant Hakam Singh's share through a valid family settlement, as Singh had constructed them from his own funds and maintained settled possession, while the plaintiff (residing in Mumbai) failed to prove the property's ancestral status. The court affirmed the lower courts' factual findings, noting second appeals cannot re-examine findings of fact absent legal error. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case