SAHJAHAN AND ORS. vs DEVENDER AND ORS. — FAO/4115/2010
Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISMISSED on 13th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010886242010
Filing Number
FAO/4115/2010
Filing Date
19-Apr-2010
Registration No
FAO/4115/2010
Registration Date
23-Jul-2010
Judge
Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta
Coram
Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta
Bench Type
Single
Category
500.37 - APPL FILED BY CLAIMANT FOR ENHANCE IN GEN CASES ( 902 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I
Decision Date
13-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
Contested--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.SAHJAHAN AND ORS.
Adv. SHIV KUMAR
Respondent(s)
-
1.DEVENDER AND ORS.
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
13-May-2026
Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF
Summary of FAO/4115/2010 (Sahjahan v. Devender): The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the appellants' motor accident compensation appeal for non-prosecution. The appellants sought enhancement of compensation awarded by the MACT Faridabad in 2020, but despite repeated court directions and letters (dated February and April 2026) requesting correct addresses of respondents for service completion, the appellants' counsel took no steps. With no appearance by appellants on the hearing date, Justice Nidhi Gupta found their casual and careless approach unjustifiable and dismissed the appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
11-Mar-2011
—
Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh
-
11-Feb-2011
—
Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh
-
21-Jan-2011
—
Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh
-
17-Dec-2010
—
Mr. Justice Kuldip Singh
-
22-Nov-2010
First hearing
Initial hearing scheduled
-
19-Apr-2010
Case filed
Registration No. FAO/4115/2010
Summary of FAO/4115/2010 (Sahjahan v. Devender): The High Court of Punjab & Haryana dismissed the appellants' motor accident compensation appeal for non-prosecution. The appellants sought enhancement of compensation awarded by the MACT Faridabad in 2020, but despite repeated court directions and letters (dated February and April 2026) requesting correct addresses of respondents for service completion, the appellants' counsel took no steps. With no appearance by appellants on the hearing date, Justice Nidhi Gupta found their casual and careless approach unjustifiable and dismissed the appeal accordingly. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts