KULDEEP SINGH AND ORS vs STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS — CWP/23084/2016

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 15th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 08-Nov-2016

CNR: PHHC010885362016

Filing Number

CWP/23084/2016

Filing Date

04-Nov-2016

Registration No

CWP/23084/2016

Registration Date

05-Nov-2016

Judge

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Coram

Mr. Justice Tribhuvan Dahiya

Bench Type

Single

Category

58.11 - SERVICE-EDU-HARYANA(SR.EDUCATION DEPT) ( 706 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

15-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KULDEEP SINGH AND ORS

    Adv. NARESH KAUSHIK

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 15-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Tribhuvan DahiyaView PDF

    The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition seeking regularization of Assistant Professor services by directing the Director of Higher Education to consider the petitioners' case in accordance with a Supreme Court decision (Madan Singh v. State of Haryana) and pass a speaking order within six months. If the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned must pay ₹50,000 as costs to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 31-Jan-2017

    Mr. Justice Ajay Tewari

  4. 31-Jan-2017

    Mrs. Justice Rekha Mittal

  5. 08-Nov-2016

    Mr. Justice Rajiv Narain Raina

  6. 08-Nov-2016

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 04-Nov-2016

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/23084/2016

casestatus.in Summary

The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition seeking regularization of Assistant Professor services by directing the Director of Higher Education to consider the petitioners' case in accordance with a Supreme Court decision (Madan Singh v. State of Haryana) and pass a speaking order within six months. If the order is not passed within the stipulated period, the officer concerned must pay ₹50,000 as costs to the petitioners. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

Search Another Case