NEETU vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB — CWP/19796/2021

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 14th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 30-Sep-2021

CNR: PHHC010885212021

Filing Number

CWP/33148/2021

Filing Date

21-Sep-2021

Registration No

CWP/19796/2021

Registration Date

28-Sep-2021

Judge

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Coram

Mr. Justice Kuldeep Tiwari

Bench Type

Single

Category

68.26 - SERVICE-ENGINEERING-PUNJAB(PWD,B&R&PUBLIC HEALTH ( 782 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

14-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.NEETU

    Adv. P K GOKLANEY

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. PUNJAB

  2. 2.CHIEF ENGINEER, PWD PUNJAB (B AND R)

  3. 3.SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, PUNJAB PWD (B AND R) ELECTRICAL

  4. 4.EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, PUNJAB PWD (B AND R) ELECTRICAL DIVISION

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 14-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Kuldeep TiwariView PDF

    The High Court directed the State of Punjab to reconsider petitioner Neetu's claim for differential pay for the period her deceased husband held additional charge as Junior Engineer, applying the same criteria used to approve similar claims by employees Sat Pal and Tejpal Singh. The department was ordered to complete this reconsideration within six weeks based on the principle of parity among similarly situated employees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 30-Sep-2021

    Other

  4. 21-Sep-2021

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/19796/2021

casestatus.in Summary

The High Court directed the State of Punjab to reconsider petitioner Neetu's claim for differential pay for the period her deceased husband held additional charge as Junior Engineer, applying the same criteria used to approve similar claims by employees Sat Pal and Tejpal Singh. The department was ordered to complete this reconsideration within six weeks based on the principle of parity among similarly situated employees. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case