KRISHAN KUMAR GUPTA vs SUSHANT SINHA AND ANR — COCP/3442/2025

Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 13th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 18-Jul-2025

CNR: PHHC010884542025

Filing Number

COCP/34327/2025

Filing Date

27-May-2025

Registration No

COCP/3442/2025

Registration Date

16-Jul-2025

Judge

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Coram

Ms. Justice Nidhi Gupta

Bench Type

Single

Category

34 - CIVIL CONTEMPTS ( 564 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

CIVIL REVISION BRANCH-I

Decision Date

13-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.KRISHAN KUMAR GUPTA

    Adv. VAIBHAV GUPTA

  2. 2.KRISHA KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.SUSHANT SINHA AND ANR

  2. 2.KRISHA KUMAR

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 13-May-2026

    Ms. Justice Nidhi GuptaView PDF

    Case Summary: COCP/3442/2025 The contempt petition filed by Krishan Kumar Gupta against Sushant Sinha was disposed of as infructuous on 13.05.2026. The petitioner had alleged violation of a Writ Court order dated 08.04.2025 directing that a judgment dated 11.05.2023 be marked "not reportable" as a restricted category case. The respondents demonstrated full compliance by filing a compliance report showing the inadvertently published judgment had been taken down, which the petitioner's counsel acknowledged after review. Justice Nidhi Gupta accordingly discharged the rule and disposed of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 27-May-2025

    Case filed

    Registration No. COCP/3442/2025

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: COCP/3442/2025 The contempt petition filed by Krishan Kumar Gupta against Sushant Sinha was disposed of as infructuous on 13.05.2026. The petitioner had alleged violation of a Writ Court order dated 08.04.2025 directing that a judgment dated 11.05.2023 be marked "not reportable" as a restricted category case. The respondents demonstrated full compliance by filing a compliance report showing the inadvertently published judgment had been taken down, which the petitioner's counsel acknowledged after review. Justice Nidhi Gupta accordingly discharged the rule and disposed of the petition. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case