SUBHASH TOMAR vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA — CWP/18869/2022

Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISPOSED OF on 12th May 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 26-Aug-2022

CNR: PHHC010881752022

Filing Number

CWP/35347/2022

Filing Date

10-Aug-2022

Registration No

CWP/18869/2022

Registration Date

24-Aug-2022

Judge

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Coram

Mr. Justice Vikas Suri , Mr. Justice Suvir Sehgal

Bench Type

Double

Category

8.4 - HUID HARYANA((HOUSING URBAN INDL. DEVELOPMENT) ( 405 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

12-May-2026

Nature of Disposal

--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 01-Jun-2026

Acts & Sections

Constitution of India Section 1

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.SUBHASH TOMAR

    Adv. SHIV KUMAR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA

  2. 2.CHIEF ADMINISTRATOR,HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,PANCHKULA

  3. 3.THE ESTATE OFFICER,HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,FARIDABAD

  4. 4.ADMINISTRATOR,HARYANA URBAN DEVELOPMENT AUTHORITY,FARIDABAD

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 12-May-2026

    Mr. Justice Vikas Suri,mr. Justice Suvir SehgalView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP-18869-2022 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the writ petition filed by Subhash Tomar (and similar petition by Sunita Soni) challenging a November 2021 HUDA policy that excluded subsequent purchasers of plots from alternate site allotment. The court noted that HUDA amended its policy in August 2024 to include re-allottees, and that the petitioners' cases were recommended for consideration. The court disposed of the petitions, directing HUDA to complete procedural formalities and allot alternate sites to the petitioners within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 26-Aug-2022

    Other

  4. 10-Aug-2022

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/18869/2022

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP-18869-2022 The High Court of Punjab & Haryana allowed the writ petition filed by Subhash Tomar (and similar petition by Sunita Soni) challenging a November 2021 HUDA policy that excluded subsequent purchasers of plots from alternate site allotment. The court noted that HUDA amended its policy in August 2024 to include re-allottees, and that the petitioners' cases were recommended for consideration. The court disposed of the petitions, directing HUDA to complete procedural formalities and allot alternate sites to the petitioners within four months. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case