JOGINDER SINGH vs STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS — CWP/16383/2018

Case under No Acts Defined. Disposed: Contested--DISPOSED OF on 24th March 2026.

Case disposed Next hearing 09-Jul-2018

CNR: PHHC010869742018

Filing Number

CWP/16383/2018

Filing Date

05-Jul-2018

Registration No

CWP/16383/2018

Registration Date

06-Jul-2018

Judge

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Coram

Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh Nalwa

Bench Type

Single

Category

68.22 - SERVICE-PUNJAB POLICE-RETIRAL BENEFITS ( 780 )

Sub-Category

( 944 )

Judicial Branch

WRITS -I BRANCH

Decision Date

24-Mar-2026

Nature of Disposal

Contested--DISPOSED OF

Last updated 11-Apr-2026

Acts & Sections

No Acts Defined

Petitioner(s)

  1. 1.JOGINDER SINGH

    Adv. VIVEK K. THAKUR

Respondent(s)

  1. 1.STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS

Case History

  1. Case disposedDisposed

  2. 24-Mar-2026

    Mr. Justice Deepinder Singh NalwaView PDF

    Case Summary: CWP/16383/2018 The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition with directions to reconsider the petitioner's entitlement to pension and Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity based on the Darshan Singh precedent, without adjudicating merits. The respondent was directed to decide within 6 weeks whether provisional pension till the petitioner's death (19.08.2020) and family pension to legal heirs should be granted, or pass a reasoned order denying relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

  3. 12-Nov-2018

    Mr. Justice Dr. Shekher Dhawan

  4. 12-Nov-2018

    —

    Mr. Justice Karamjit Singh

  5. 09-Jul-2018

    Mr. Justice Jaspal Singh

  6. 09-Jul-2018

    First hearing

    Initial hearing scheduled

  7. 05-Jul-2018

    Case filed

    Registration No. CWP/16383/2018

casestatus.in Summary

Case Summary: CWP/16383/2018 The Punjab and Haryana High Court disposed of the petition with directions to reconsider the petitioner's entitlement to pension and Death-cum-Retirement Gratuity based on the Darshan Singh precedent, without adjudicating merits. The respondent was directed to decide within 6 weeks whether provisional pension till the petitioner's death (19.08.2020) and family pension to legal heirs should be granted, or pass a reasoned order denying relief. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.

Explore other courts

District Courts Supreme Court
Search Another Case