ISHWAR SINGH SANGWAN vs STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA — CWP/17635/2022
Case under Constitution of India Section 1. Disposed: --DISMISSED on 12th May 2026.
CNR: PHHC010867142022
Filing Number
CWP/34763/2022
Filing Date
08-Aug-2022
Registration No
CWP/17635/2022
Registration Date
09-Aug-2022
Judge
Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil
Coram
Mr. Justice Sandeep Moudgil
Bench Type
Single
Category
58.27 - SER-ENGINEERING-HAR(PWD,B&R&PUB.HEALTH-RETIRAL ( 717 )
Sub-Category
( 944 )
Judicial Branch
WRITS -I BRANCH
Decision Date
12-May-2026
Nature of Disposal
--DISMISSED
Last updated 01-Jun-2026
Acts & Sections
Petitioner(s)
-
1.ISHWAR SINGH SANGWAN
Adv. NILESH BHARDWAJ
Respondent(s)
-
1.STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS Advocate - A.G. HARYANA
-
2.THE SECRETARY TO GOVT. OF HARYANA
-
3.THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER
Case History
-
Case disposedDisposed
-
12-May-2026
Mr. Justice Sandeep MoudgilView PDF
Case Summary: CWP/17635/2022 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Ishwar Singh Sangwan's petition challenging a recovery order from his pension. The court found that Sangwan, a retired Executive Engineer, had voluntarily undertaken to refund any excess payments and was bound by written undertakings dated 1997 and 1998. Though the State granted him an improved pay scale of Rs.13,500-17,250 w.e.f. 01.01.1996, it simultaneously recovered Rs.72,900 from his pension for the period 01.05.1989-31.12.1995, as this represented overpayment due to non-implementation of an earlier departmental letter. The court upheld the recovery, finding no enforceable right for the petitioner to retain public funds he was never entitled to, and ruled the petition devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
-
10-Aug-2022
Other
-
08-Aug-2022
Case filed
Registration No. CWP/17635/2022
Case Summary: CWP/17635/2022 The High Court of Punjab and Haryana dismissed Ishwar Singh Sangwan's petition challenging a recovery order from his pension. The court found that Sangwan, a retired Executive Engineer, had voluntarily undertaken to refund any excess payments and was bound by written undertakings dated 1997 and 1998. Though the State granted him an improved pay scale of Rs.13,500-17,250 w.e.f. 01.01.1996, it simultaneously recovered Rs.72,900 from his pension for the period 01.05.1989-31.12.1995, as this represented overpayment due to non-implementation of an earlier departmental letter. The court upheld the recovery, finding no enforceable right for the petitioner to retain public funds he was never entitled to, and ruled the petition devoid of merit. This case analysis is maintained by casestatus.in based on publicly available court records.
Explore other courts